Research Journal

September 5, 2010

research question

Filed under: dissertation,Thoughts,Uncategorized — Jim Flowers @ 12:53 pm

Do a careful read of this article in the NYT.  I’ve been thinking of the interaction between users and the technicians responsible for security as an area that one might investigate for signs of institutional intransigence regarding changes in behavior related to security outcomes.  Perhaps the user community is more attune to their security needs than the service technicians responsible for providing security.   And, then, perhaps not.  Can you have users tuned into security issues interact with security teams and still not have a more secure environment than the combination of ignorant users and not so knowledgeable security teams?

After investigating password requirements in a variety of settings, Mr. Herley is critical not of users but of system administrators who aren’t paying enough attention to the inconvenience of making people comply with arcane rules. “It is not users who need to be better educated on the risks of various attacks, but the security community,” he said at a meeting of security professionals, the New Security Paradigms Workshop, at Queen’s College in Oxford, England. “Security advice simply offers a bad cost-benefit tradeoff to users.”

Essay a must read

Advertisement

Leave a Comment »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.